Kumal Burton v. Paul Renico, Warden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “strategic choices by counsel, while not necessarily those a federal judge in hindsight might make, do not rise to the level of a Sixth Amendment violation”
• holding that “strategic choices by counsel, while not necessarily those a federal judge in hindsight might make, do not rise to the level of a Sixth Amendment violation”
• holding that “[s]trategic choices by counsel, while not necessarily those a federal judge in hindsight might make, do not rise to the level of a Sixth Amendment violation.”
• holding “strategic choices by counsel, while not necessarily those a federal judge in hindsight might make, do not rise to the level of a Sixth Amendment violation.”
• where claim of prosecutorial misconduct lacks merit, counsel is not ineffective in declining to raise issue on appeal
• where claim of prosecutorial misconduct lacks merit, counsel is not ineffective in declining to raise issue on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).