Kulpeksa v. Kulpeksa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that Texas Supreme Court has repudiated notion that “UDJA confers some broader right to sue government to obtain ‘statutory construction’ or a ‘declaration of rights’”
• explaining that mandamus action under Chapter 103 must be filed in supreme court
• looking to “‘claims’ underlying substantive nature” to determine subject matter jurisdiction
• “any attempt by Springsteen to challenge the Comptroller's determinations through his suit would infringe upon the exclusive jurisdiction of the Texas Supreme Court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).