Skip to main content
· 7/11/1894

Kulp v. Brant

Citations

  • 162 Pa. 222
  • 29 A. 729
  • 1894 Pa. LEXIS 967

Syllabus

<p>Married woman — Surety for husband's debt — Fraud—Agency.</p> <p>A married woman may assign her personal property as security for her husband’s debt; and the assignment is good, although the husband made false representations to his wife to secure the assignment, if the creditor had no knowledge of the fraud. In such a case the husband cannot be considered as the agent of the creditor to secure the assignment.</p> <p>Collateral security — Statute of limitations — Surety.</p> <p>Even if a debt be barred by the statute of limitations, the collateral remains liable, and a third person who has furnished, the collateral is not prejudiced by the debtor giving a bond for the debt, in place of a note which has been barred by the statute.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It is inappropriate for one party to assert another party’s rights as it lacks standing to do so.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dean, Fell, Green, McCollum, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.