Skip to main content
· 12/17/1891

Kullman v. Greenebaum

Citations

  • 92 Cal. 403
  • 28 P. 674
  • 1891 Cal. LEXIS 1221

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the ten-year statute of limitation for judgments to determine whether a wife’s claim for unpaid benefits was barred in a case where the parties’ divorce decree incorporated a settlement agreement providing that the husband would pay the wife one-half of his retirement benefits
  • “[T]he dormancy period does not begin to run until each installment is due. In other words, each installment payment is treated as a new and separate judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McFarland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.