· 12/17/1891
Kullman v. Greenebaum
Citations
- 92 Cal. 403
- 28 P. 674
- 1891 Cal. LEXIS 1221
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying the ten-year statute of limitation for judgments to determine whether a wife’s claim for unpaid benefits was barred in a case where the parties’ divorce decree incorporated a settlement agreement providing that the husband would pay the wife one-half of his retirement benefits
- “[T]he dormancy period does not begin to run until each installment is due. In other words, each installment payment is treated as a new and separate judgment.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McFarland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.