Kulish v. Ellsworth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming that the emergency response provision is constitutional as reasonably related to a legitimate governmental interest
• concluding the statutory language is written broadly enough to cover a host of emergency situations
• concluding the plaintiffs’ request for a continuance to gather affidavits from experts rang hollow where the controversy at issue raised legal, rather than factual, questions
• characterizing the “language of section 670.4(11) — ⅛ connection with an emergency’ and ‘including but not limited to’ ” —as “broad”
• overruling the plaintiff’s claim that a city’s immunity under the emergency response exemption amounted to an equal protection violation
• affirming dismissal of common law vicarious-liability claim against county whose allegedly negligent employees enjoyed statutory immunity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).