Kulik v. Commission on Judicial Conduct

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting that OFAC’s reliance on classified evidence necessarily violates due process
• following NCORI and 2056 AL HARAMAIN ISLAMIC v. U.S. DEP’T OF TREASURY describing in detail its holding on this point
• \We already decided in [ NCRI I ] that due process required the disclosure of only the unclassified portions of the administrative record.\
• we \already decided in [ NCRI I ] that due process required the disclosure of only the unclassified portions\
• “We already decided in [NCRI I ] that due process required the disclosure of only the unclassified portions of the administrative record.”
• approving nondisclosure of classified evidence under similar circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).