Kuhn v. Williams
Citations
- 2018 CO 30
- 418 P.3d 478
Syllabus
Election Law. In this expedited appeal under CRS § 1-1-113(3), the Supreme Court addressed whether the Colorado Secretary of State (Secretary) may certify incumbent Representative Doug Lamborn to the 2018 Republican primary ballot for Colorado's Fifth Congressional District. Relying solely on the Colorado Election Code, the Court concluded he may not. The Court held that although the Secretary properly relied on the circulator's affidavit and information in the voter registration system in verifying the petition and issuing a statement of sufficiency, petitioners nonetheless had the statutory right to challenge the validity of the petition under CRS §§ 1-4-909 and 1-1-113 before the Secretary certified Rep. Lamborn's name to the ballot. Petitioners properly presented additional evidence to the district court in challenging the actual residence of the petition circulators. The Court concluded that the district erred when it focused on the challenged circulator's subjective intent to move back to Colorado, rather than the test set forth in CRS § 1-2-102, when determining the challenged circulator's residency. In applying the correct test to the essentially undisputed facts here, the Court concluded that the challenged circulator was not a resident of Colorado when he served as a circulator for the Lamborn Campaign. Accordingly, the Court reversed the district court's ruling to the contrary. Because the challenged circulator was statutorily ineligible to serve as a circulator, the signatures he collected are invalid and may not be considered. That caused the Lamborn Campaign's number of signatures to fall short of the 1,000 required to be on the Republican primary ballot. Therefore, the Court held that the Secretary may not certify Rep. Lamborn to the 2018 primary ballot for Colorado's Fifth Congressional District. The Court did not address the Lamborn Campaign's arguments regarding the constitutionality of the circulator residency requirement in CRS § 1-4-905(1) becau
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.