Kuhn v. COLDWELL BANKER LANDMARK, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that even if district court’s failure to give statute of frauds instruction was error, it was harmless because appellants failed “to demonstrate how the failure to instruct on the statute of frauds affected their substantial rights”
• declining to address challenge on appeal where no objection was raised before the district court
• “The purpose of this rule is to preserve a record for appeal----”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).