Kuhlman v. Blow

Citations

• 31 Tex. 628

Syllabus

<p>Where the suit was by an apprentice, who had served his time, for damages against his master and for a balance for labor after the expiration of his time, and there was neither bill of exceptions nor statements of facts, yet ' the court discussed the findings of the jury and the charge of the court, and, giving every presumption in favor of the charge, sustained the judgment.</p> <p>Where the petition declared an item for $120, and the verdict was for $140, on that item the court allowed the seeming error (the difference might have been caused by interest) to be cured by remittitur.</p>