· 2/28/1992
Kuhl v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
Citations
- 827 P.2d 1
- 250 Kan. 332
- 1992 Kan. LEXIS 49
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “There is no per se rule which discredits identical awards, and there is no provision in the current law for comparison of one plaintiffs recovery with another’s to serve as the basis for overturning a jury’s verdict.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allegrucci, Abbott, Bullock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.