Skip to main content
· 2/24/1953

Kugler v. Timpte Bros.

Citations

  • 127 Colo. 138
  • 254 P.2d 430
  • 1953 Colo. LEXIS 355

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the notice requirements of Cobb do not apply in this case” because plaintiff “has not shown any justifiable reliance that would estop [defendant] from asserting its security interest in the vehicle”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.