· 2/24/1953
Kugler v. Timpte Bros.
Citations
- 127 Colo. 138
- 254 P.2d 430
- 1953 Colo. LEXIS 355
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “the notice requirements of Cobb do not apply in this case” because plaintiff “has not shown any justifiable reliance that would estop [defendant] from asserting its security interest in the vehicle”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.