Kuerschner & Rauchwarenfabrik, A.G. v. New York Trust Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• issuing final warning to pro se plaintiff that action will be dismissed if he fails to comply with court order due to his flagrant, intentional and willful failure to obey prior court orders
• “[M]agistrate judges have broad discretion to regulate nondispositive matters, and reversal is warranted only if that discretion is abused.”
• “That reasonable minds may differ on the wisdom of a legal conclusion does not mean that it is clearly erroneous or contrary to law.”
• “Pro se litigants must comply with local rules, and the failure to do so is sanctionable.”
• “[M]agistrate judges have broad discretion to regulate nondispositive matters, and reversal is warranted only if that discretion is abused.”
• “Although legal authority may support an objection, the critical inquiry is whether there is legal authority that supports the magistrate’s conclusion, in which case there is no abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).