Kuehn v. Pub Zone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the adoption of a bar policy against allowing patrons to enter wearing gang colors 36 -- a policy that was not followed on the day of the assault at issue -- was relevant in a duty analysis
• distinguishing Ivins v. Town Tavern, 335 N.J. Super. 188 (App. Div. 2000), 21 and finding a duty of care owed to a bar patron in light of factual circumstances indicating knowledge of the risk
• expert's testimony was relevant to issues under consideration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).