Kuchinski v. Burns

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the plaintiffs argument that the ninety day period should run from the date of the appointment of the fiduciary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Warkentin v. Burns
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-07-21· cited 64×
• Gagne v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1991-10-08· cited 16×
• State v. Carey
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1991-07-30· cited 5×
• Kuchinski v. Burns
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-10-23

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Horton v. Meskill
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1977-04-19· cited 383×
• Duguay v. Hopkins
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-08-23· cited 225×
• Fetterman v. University of Connecticut
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-04-03· cited 108×
• Textron, Inc. v. Wood
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1974-12-03· cited 89×
• Krozser v. City of New Haven
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-08-01· cited 88×
• Zotta v. Burns
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1986-07-15· cited 62×
• Town of Wethersfield v. National Fire Insurance
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1958-06-17· cited 48×
• LoRusso v. Hill
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1953-03-03· cited 28×

Other cases named Kuchinski v. Burns

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Kuchinski v. Burns
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-10-23