Kucera v. Kucera

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that money deposited by client with his attorney during pendency of dissolution action would not be proper subject of charging lien as not being proceeds of a judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Litman v. FINE, JACOBSON, SCHWARTZ
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-12-22· cited 46×
• Scutieri v. Estate of Revitz
  S.D. Florida· 1993-06-25· cited 6×
• Conroy v. Conroy
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-04-11· cited 4×
• Yavitz v. Martinez, Charlip, Delgado & Befeler
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-10-16· cited 4×
• Richman Greer Weil Brumbaugh Mirabito & Christensen, PA v. Chernak
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-12· cited 3×
• Freedman v. Horton, Schwartz & Perse
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-04-15· cited 2×
• Klein-Brown v. Brown
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-06-25

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Chaachou v. Chaachou
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1960-06-30· cited 18×
• Worley v. Phillips
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1972-06-14· cited 14×
• Cristiani v. Cristiani
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1959-10-02· cited 11×
• Weksler v. Stamatinos
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-06-24· cited 4×