Kubik v. Route 252, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a business website that provided driving directions from Philadelphia, sent out a newsletter to solicit business, and sold gift certificates did not constitute regularly conducting business in Philadelphia
• holding contacts between Delaware County restaurant and Philadelphia County were incidental, where they consisted of solicitation of patrons by email newsletter, selling gift certificates to Philadelphia residents, and purchased goods in Philadelphia County
• analogizing certain web activities to newspaper and phone book advertising and holding that such is insufficient for purposes of laying venue
• explaining mere solicitation of business in county does not amount to regularly conducting business
• applying existing decisional law to resolve the “the novel question of whether [defendant restaurant’s] activities on its website entail ‘regularly conducted business,’” and holding such activities did not establish venue in Philadelphia
• restaurant purchasing goods in Philadelphia not sufficient to show the restaurant regularly conducts business in Philadelphia

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).