Skip to main content
· 9/30/1994

Kube v. New Penn Motor Express, Inc.

Citations

  • 865 F. Supp. 221
  • 4 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 560
  • 147 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2561
  • 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13951
  • 1994 WL 532133

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that LMRA did not preempt handicap or retaliatory discharge claims brought under NJLAD
  • noting that Doran Court preempted claim “because it was based on the allegation that the employer had incorrectly interpreted the collective bargaining agreement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brotman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.