Skip to main content
· 10/11/1996

Kuan v. Lund (In Re Lund)

Citations

  • 202 B.R. 127
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 13584
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8749
  • 1996 Bankr. LEXIS 1365
  • 1996 WL 640759

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the “debtor must make a promise while knowing it to be false at the time in order to support a nondis-chargeability action under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A)”
  • Upholding finding that damage, including broken windows and holes in drywall, might have been performed unintentionally
  • “On a motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(c), the judge is the trier of fact and may weigh and consider the evidence and sustain defendant’s motion though plaintiffs evidence establishes a prima facie case that would have precluded a directed verdict for defendant in a jury case.” (quotations omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hagan, Montali, Volinn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.