Kt & G Corp. v. ATTORNEY GEN. OF STATE OF OKLAHOMA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that rational basis standard applies if a court has rejected the plaintiffs argument that its rights under the First Amendment have been violated by a state statute
• declining to address the state-action doctrine after having found no hybrid restraint in a case essentially identical to this case
• declining to address the state-action doctrine after having found no hybrid restraint in a case essentially identical to this case
• disagreeing with the Second Circuit's decision in Pryor, 425 F.3d at 171–72, which found a \possible\ dormant Commerce Clause violation based on the hypothetical refund
• denying appellants' procedural due process challenge to Kansas's and Oklahoma's allocable share amendments
• “Thus, the refundability of the payments is directly related to the [NPMs’] future liability for tobacco-related losses.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).