Skip to main content
· 8/12/1914

Kryptok Co. v. Haussmann & Co.

Citations

  • 216 F. 267
  • 1914 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1589

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “By its own terms, the CAFRA applies only to 7 proceedings under a ‘civil forfeiture statute,’ and that term does not include ‘any . . . 8 provision of law . . . codified in Title 19.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dickinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.