· 8/12/1914
Kryptok Co. v. Haussmann & Co.
Citations
- 216 F. 267
- 1914 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1589
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “By its own terms, the CAFRA applies only to 7 proceedings under a ‘civil forfeiture statute,’ and that term does not include ‘any . . . 8 provision of law . . . codified in Title 19.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dickinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.