Kruse v. Town of Westford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that factfinder “is under no obligation to accept, interpret, or apply evidence in accordance with the views of either party”
• explaining that presumption is overcome when taxpayer introduces evidence tending to show property appraised above fair market value as evidenced by valuations of comparable properties
• noting that Board, as trier of fact, is under no obligation to accept, interpret, or apply evidence in accordance with views of either party; it is within Board’s discretion to determine weight, credibility and persuasive effect of evidence
• noting that trier of fact is under no obligation to accept, interpret, or apply evidence in accordance with views of either party; it is within its discretion to determine weight, credibility and persuasive effect of evidence
• noting that trier of fact is under no obligation to accept, interpret, or apply evidence in accordance with views of ether party; it is within its discretion to determine weight, credibility, and persuasive effect of evidence
• noting that trier of fact is under no obligation to accept, interpret, or apply evidence in accordance with views of ether party; it is within its discretion to determine weight, credibility, and persuasive effect of evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).