Skip to main content
· 6/24/1993

Kruse v. Hemp

Citations

  • 853 P.2d 1373
  • 121 Wash. 2d 715
  • 1993 Wash. LEXIS 134

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the three-part test in the context 16 of an option contract
  • Under RAP 7.3, this court has \ § the authority to determine whether a matter is properly before it. . . . § \
  • Under RAP 7.3, this court has “ ‘the authority to determine whether a matter is properly before it. . . .’ ”
  • “In reviewing a summary judgment order, an appellate court evaluates the matter de novo, performing the same inquiry as the trial court.”
  • the appellate court reviews a summary judgment order de novo, performing the same inquiry as the trial court
  • the appellate court reviews a summary judgment order de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Guy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.