Skip to main content
· 1/16/1885

Kruse v. Chester

Citations

  • 66 Cal. 353
  • 5 P. 613
  • 1885 Cal. LEXIS 435

Syllabus

<p>Evidence—Expert—Handwriting.—A witness called as an expert in handwriting must confine his testimony to facts; he cannot state his inferences deduced from the facts.</p> <p>Id.—Altered Record.—Evidence to Explain—Discretion.—Where a record, after a full inquiry as to its genuineness, is excluded from evidence, on the ground that it had been altered after it was made, the allowance of further evidence in relation to it is within the discretion of the trial court.</p>

Judges: Thornton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.