Krupnick v. Romano

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plain reading of “carrying an explosive ‘during the commission of’” a felony foreclosed a relational requirement between the felony and the explosives
• holding that a plain reading of “carrying an explosive ‘during the commission of’” a felony foreclosed a relational requirement between the felony and the explosives
• holding that a plain reading of “carrying an explosive ‘during the commission of ” a felony foreclosed a relational requirement between the felony and the explosives
• comparing two statutes enacted within two years of each other to interpret a common word in the subsequently enacted statute
• describing a conviction under §1001 for making “false statements to a customs official” to obtain entry into the United States
• describing a conviction under § 1001 for making “false statements to a customs offcial” to obtain entry into the United States

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).