Krumnow v. Krumnow

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that parties had notice that court was considering receivership issue on its own motion but facts did not justify appointment of receiver to preserve trust and probate property
• concluding that parties had notice that court was considering receivership issue on its own motion but facts did not justify appointment of receiver to preserve trust and probate property
• noting that appointment without notice to adverse party should only be exercised “when the status of the property cannot be maintained and the rights of applicants protected pending a hearing by restraining order or temporary injunction or any less drastic remedy”
• noting that appointment without notice to adverse party should only be exercised “when the status of the property cannot be maintained and the rights of applicants protected pending a hearing by restraining order or temporary injunction or any less drastic remedy”
• “trial court erred in appointing a receiver without notice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).