Krumme v. Mercury Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the Insurance Code “displace[s] the UCL” for “activities related to rate setting”
• finding no abuse of discretion when trial court declined to refer the case to 25 Commissioner based on Commissioner’s amicus curiae brief
• “A claim predicated on a violation of the Insurance Code not related to ratemaking 13 may thus be framed as a claim under the UCL.”
• courts do not construe statutes in isolation, but rather read every statute with reference to the entire scheme of law of which it is part so that the whole may be harmonized and retain effectiveness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).