Krulla v. Barnett Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• awarding benefits to a man who terminated his employment because he was physically unable to perform the manual labor required, and reasoning that an unemployed claimant should not be penalized for taking an unsuitable position
• awarding unemployment benefits because claimant was physically unable to do job
• “[WJhere the commission errs as a matter of law, this court is empowered to reverse their determination.”
• “[T]he real issue is not whether blame can be assigned to the employer for the employee’s inability to perform the job. Rather, the inquiry should be whether the individual is physically unable to perform the job duties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).