Krulikoski v. Sparling

Citations

• 82 Wash. 474
• 144 P. 692

Syllabus

<p>New Trial — Grounds—Inadequate Damages — Verdict eor One Dollar — Eefect. Where plaintiff and defendant were each claiming damages from the other by reason of the other’s negligence in causing an automobile collision, and the evidence was such that a verdict for plaintiff for one dollar might be interpreted as a finding exonerating defendant, it is not error to refuse plaintiff a new trial, on the ground of inadequate damages, although the evidence indicated substantial damages were sustained by the plaintiff.</p>