Kruger v. Kruger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[a]n order granting leave to amend permits the party to amend; it does not require it”
• noting “Florida’s long-standing policy in favor of adjudication on the merits, and against procedural default”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Portofino Professional Center v. Prime Homes
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-02-05· cited 5×
• Reverse Mortgage Solution, Inc. v. The Unknown Heirs, Devisees, Grantees, Assignees, Lienors, Creditors, Trustees, etc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-10-07· cited 1×
• Michelle Gerbino v. Isle of Paradise B, Inc., Gus Nasiell, Jean-Paul and Marie Berthiaume, Kasey and Kevin McClung and Anthony Vitale
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-08-20
• JEFFREY GONZALEZ v. FERCO MOTORS CORP., etc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-02-24
• Merl v. Jeffrey S. Weiner, P.A.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-04-02

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Kozel v. Ostendorf
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1994-01-13· cited 243×
• Edward L. Nezelek, Inc. v. Sunbeam Tel. Corp.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-03-16· cited 39×
• Sekot Laboratories, Inc. v. Gleason
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-09-17· cited 13×
• Neu v. Turgel
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-12-24· cited 11×
• McMillan v. Horan
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-02-25· cited 2×
• Hunter v. Montalvo
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-10-05· cited 1×