Krueger v. Zoning Board of Appeals

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiffs “unsupported assertion that the ... defendants’ nonretaliatory reasons for the challenged actions were pretextual was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact” regarding the NYCHRL claim
• affirming summary judgment for defendant on NYCHRL retaliation claim where plaintiff “failed to ... demonstrate any causal nexus between her protected activity and the alleged retaliation”
• “[The] enhanced retaliation provision contained in the NYCHRL expanded the definition of actionable retaliatory conduct to include manifestations of retaliation which might not meet the standards under comparable state and federal law[.]”
• “a plaintiff must show that (1) he or she engaged in a protected activity . . ., (2) his or her employer was aware that he or she participated in such activity, (3
• analyzing whether there was awareness of plaintiff’s protected activities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).