Krueger v. Krueger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the parties’ acknowledgment to pay their own fees and costs for services “incurred by this action” would not include the fees that the wife incurred in the post-divorce modification proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kartzmark v. Kartzmark
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-04-01· cited 9×
• Harbin v. Harbin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-06-30· cited 9×
• Spano v. Spano
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-08-06· cited 4×
• Tarafa v. Takach
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-12-14· cited 1×
• Bartolotta v. Bartolotta
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-07-19

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Burdack v. Burdack
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-05-25· cited 17×
• Milligan v. Addison
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-07-16· cited 11×
• Overbey v. Overbey
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-05-31· cited 3×