Kruckenberg v. Powell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[L]itigants 3 have no right to have, or not have, any particular judge of a court hear their cause and no due process right to be heard before any assignment or reassignment of a particular case to a particular judge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rodriguez v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2006-01-19· cited 118×
• State v. Peterson
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-02-27· cited 53×
• Muehleman v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2009-02-19· cited 32×
• Gallagher v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-10-10· cited 23×
• Lee v. McNeil
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1992-01-27· cited 22×
• Willie v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-05-20· cited 14×
• Kalmanson v. Lockett
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-05-23· cited 9×
• Anderson v. Wagner
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-08-18· cited 6×
• Adler v. Seligman of Florida, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-07-23· cited 5×
• Allen v. Bridge
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-02-16· cited 4×
• State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Vickers v. Pelsey
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-08· cited 4×
• Bobbitt v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-02-05· cited 3×
• Aymara Sorhegui v. Park East Home Owners Association, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-08-28