Krotz v. Louisiana Const. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• clarifying that the “acceptable medical practice” standard is not BOP-specific, but relative to medical care administered by plaintiff’s non-BOP providers prior to incarceration
• clarifying that the “acceptable medical practice” standard is not BOP-specific, but relative to medical care administered by plaintiff’s non-BOP providers prior to incarceration
• finding defendant, a PHS officer at the time of relevant events, immune from Bivens suit
• declining to dismiss sua sponte the Bivens claims against John Doe defendants, who had not been served
• “Magistrate Judge . . . correctly found that Plaintiff’s Bivens claims against BOP and against Mitchell in her official capacity should be dismissed.”
• “Mitchell is immune from suit under the PHSA because Mitchell was a PHS employee at the time of the relevant events and Plaintiff's claims arise from Mitchell's alleged performance of functions related to the provision of medical services.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).