Krotz v. CSX Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no duty requiring a landowner to control vegetation on property for the benefit of users of a public highway
• finding no duty requiring a landowner to control vegetation on property for the benefit of users of a public highway

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Driggers v. Locke
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1996-01-16· cited 32×
• Barnes v. Stone-Quinn
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1993-12-29· cited 18×
• Ingenito v. Rosen
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1992-11-09· cited 17×
• Lubitz v. Village of Scarsdale
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2006-07-18· cited 9×
• Clementoni v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2006-06-09· cited 4×
• Savage v. Scanlon
  N.D. New York· 1998-05-20
• RGR, LLC v. Settle
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 2014-10-31
• Scattareggia v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
  New York Supreme Court· 1986-12-30

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Hayes v. Malkan
  New York Court of Appeals· 1970-04-22· cited 38×