Kroptavich v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “the law of the case doctrine does not apply where it is clear that the two orders in question addressed different legal questions”
• concluding deposition and business records attached as exhibits to the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, “were properly made part of the certified record.” (citations omitted)
• stating that “inferences acceptable at the prima facie stage may not satisfy the higher level of specificity usually required at the pretext stage”
• finding depositions and various other business record exhibits that the moving party attached to the motion for summary judgment were properly made part of the certified record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).