Skip to main content
· 10/29/1962

Kropp Forge Co. v. Jawitz

Citations

  • 186 N.E.2d 76
  • 37 Ill. App. 2d 475
  • 1962 Ill. App. LEXIS 390

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to decide whether a party’s purported acceptance conformed to the offer because the parties’ conduct established that even if the purported acceptance did not conform, it was a counteroffer that was subsequently accepted, thus forming a contract
  • but see Baughman Mfg. Co. v. Hein Equip. Co., 44 Ill. App. 2d 373 [1963]
  • where defendant visited forum state to inspect machinery to be purchased, personal jurisdiction existed either because he allegedly made contract there or because his inspection was activity in the state “in furtherance of’ the contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Bubman, English

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.