Kropfelder v. Snap-On Tools Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that warehousemen who load and unload trucks used to deliver goods in interstate commerce are not transportation workers
• concluding that payment for and acceptance of benefits after the expiration of a contract reflected “an intent to continue the terms of the prior contract”
• concluding that payment for and acceptance of benefits after the expiration of a contract reflected “an intent to continue the terms of the prior contract”
• holding that a car dealership’s finance manager was not transportation worker
• holding that a car dealership’s finance manager was not transportation worker
• finding that warehousemen who load and unload trucks 26 27 9 1 2 used to deliver goods in interstate commerce, but do not deliver the goods themselves, are not 3 transportation workers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).