Skip to main content
· 11/22/2010

Kropf v. TCA, INC.

Citations

  • 752 F. Supp. 2d 797
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123352
  • 2010 WL 4722282

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing the defendant’s counterclaim and stating that § 1692k “contemplates a post-trial proceeding following an assessment of the merits of a plaintiff’s complaint.”
  • noting that “the majority of cases to consider this issue [under the FDCPA] have instead dismissed the counterclaim as premature or for lack of a statutory cause of action, permitting defendants to renew attorney’s fee requests at the conclusion of the case”
  • “the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act does not create an independent cause of action for attorney’s fees”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: David M. Lawson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.