· 2/11/1998
Kroll v. Nehmer
Citations
- 705 A.2d 716
- 348 Md. 616
- 1998 Md. LEXIS 18
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[Cjourts have generally refused to apply the doctrine unless the two instruments reflect a common dispositive scheme.”
- discussing the doctrine of dependent relative revocation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell, Eldridge, Rodowsky, Chasanow, Raker, Wilner, Karwacki
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.