Skip to main content
· 10/15/1932

Krohnberg v. Thomas Holding Co.

Citations

  • 236 A.D. 793

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that prior “awareness” language was dicta and simply one sign of a relationship between the parties
  • unjust enrichment claim dismissed for lack of privity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.