Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. v. Plaggenburg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying vacatur because the movant alleged only “factual or legal errors, neither of which are valid bases for vacating an arbitrator’s award”
• denying vacatur under FAA § 10(a) because the arbitrator had a “reasonable basis” to deny the movant’s requests during the proceedings (quoting Schmidt v. Finberg, 942 F.2d 1571, 1574 (11th Cir. 1991))
• finding no partiality even where arbitrator is openly critical of one party
• “We do not find [the arbitrator’s] word choice constitutes evidence of impermissible bias to support vacatur.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).