Kroger Company v. Young

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding statements made “by an employer to his employees of reason for the discharge of a fellow employee . . . are qualifiedly privileged”
• derogatory statements about specific work habits, productivity, and ability to work with others were sufficient to support defamation action
• employees had interest in situation of co-employee and handling of company funds
• employees had interest in situation of co-employee and handling of company funds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).