Kroger Co. v. Morris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “statements of ‘beliefs’ or ‘opinions’ are insufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact”
• concluding that union members failed to state a fair-representation claim against an international union where there was insufficient evidence tying the international to events surrounding the purported DFR breach
• stating that a motion to strike is a proper procedural mechanism for challenging “the offending portions of the reply brief”
• holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow the plaintiffs to amend their complaint when they waited until after discovery had been completed and summary judgment motions had been fully briefed before filing their motion to amend
• holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow the plaintiffs to amend their complaint when they waited until after discovery had been completed and summary judgment motions had been fully briefed before filing their motion to amend
• holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow the plaintiffs to amend their complaint when they waited until after discovery had been completed and summary judgment motions had been fully briefed before filing their motion to amend

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).