Kroger Co. v. Keng

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that strained or narrow construction of section 406.033 of Workers’ Compensation Act would be improper
• holding that strained or narrow construction of section 406.033 of Workers’ Compensation Act would be improper
• holding that strained or narrow construction of section 406.033 of Workers’ Compensation Act would be improper
• holding that strained or narrow construction of section 406.033 of Workers = Compensation Act would be improper
• stating that a comparative responsibility question would always yield an immaterial finding
• non-subscribing employer is not entitled to a jury question on its employee’s alleged comparative responsibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).