Krocka v. Riegler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding plaintiffs intentional infliction of emotional distress claim barred because it was “inextricably linked” to ADA claim and had no independent basis absent the allegations of discrimination
• declining to hold, on motion to dismiss, that eight‐month delay in granting plaintiff his requested job assignment was reasonable as matter of law
• declining to hold, on motion to dismiss, that eight‐month delay in granting plaintiff his requested job assignment was reasonable as matter of law
• declining to hold, on motion to dismiss, that eight‐month delay in granting plaintiff his requested job assignment was reasonable as matter of law
• an eight-month denial of a change in shift was a failure to accommodate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).