Kroblin v. RDR Motels, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the manner the parties performed during the first two years of the contract was relevant to the meaning of the contract terms
• holding parol-evidence rule did not bar admission of extrinsic evidence, where evidence was not introduced to change or vary the words of the contract
• holding the manner the parties performed during the first two years of the contract was relevant to the meaning of the contract terms
• reasoning that the trial court properly considered post signing conduct as evidence of parties’ intentions
• authorizing consideration of written and oral communications between the parties as an aid to contract interpretation
• reasoning the trial court properly considered post-signing conduct as evidence of the parties’ intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).