Skip to main content
· 9/11/1996

KRM, INC. v. Caviness

Citations

  • 925 P.2d 9
  • 122 N.M. 389

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that New Mexico statutory scheme “evince[s] an intent to create a limited statutory exception to the general rule that[, under New Mexico law,] water rights and land ownership are distinct property rights”
  • “A vested right to use water is a protected property right that can be sold, leased, or transferred.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bosson, Pickard, Armijo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.