Krivitskie v. Cramlett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the plaintiff’s willful and wanton conduct claim, which was based upon the same incident as her negligence claim, was sufficiently distinct from her negligence claim to allow her to file a separate appeal under Rule 304(a
• “However, we do believe that alleging that someone was driving too fast in the rain could support a cause of action for willful and wanton misconduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).