Skip to main content
· 12/7/1995

Kritt v. Kritt (In Re Kritt)

Citations

  • 190 B.R. 382
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 173
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 437
  • 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 1846

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a spouse’s failure to report payments as taxable income did not preclude a finding that the parties intended the payments as spousal support
  • when appealing a question of fact appellant must include the entire record relied upon by the trial court for review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hagan, Meyers, Ollason

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.