Kristopher Kelly v. Tennessee Valley Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating, on remand from Supreme Court, that “we must now decide the important and highly controversial question whether the acts of these Federal Bureau of Narcotics Agents are clothed with immunity . . . .”
• stating, on remand from Supreme Court, that “we must now decide the important and highly controversial question whether the acts of these Federal Bureau of Narcotics Agents are clothed with immunity . . . .”
• belief that probable cause exists, rather than existence of probable cause in the constitutional sense, must be proved
• belief that probable cause exists, rather than existence of probable cause in the constitutional sense, must be proved
• federal agents were not immune from suit because although arrest was within outer perimeters of duty, agents were not performing discretionary function
• reasonableness of belief that probable cause exists rather than existence of probable cause in the constitutional sense must be proved

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).